Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing

On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 20:27:52 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote:

On 2025-03-06 6:34 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

>
On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 16:50:04 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote:
 

On 2025-03-06 4:34 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>

On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 08:35:52 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote:
>

On 2025-03-05 1:49 a.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>

On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 08:55:40 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote:
>

Woke would be to ensure that everyone has the same computer today,
regardless of whether they have the means to buy something better
or not. In other words, both the rich and the poor would be
running something like today's equivalent of a Commodore 64 with
no option to increase RAM or add accessories.

>
So a Commodore 64 is “woke”, but, say, an Apple Iphone is not?

>
I didn't say that the Commodore 64 was woke ...

>
But you did use it as an example of wokeness.
>
Would an Apple Iphone be something that non-woke people might use?
(Presumably by choice.)

>
The point here, again, is that the proponents of equity would force us
all to have the same device.

 
But why a Commodore 64 rather than an Apple Iphone?

 
Because my hatred of Apple is not as potent as yours.

Apple are well-known for their DEI policies. Wouldn’t you call them an
example of a “woke” company? They even have a person of gender--one of
those that President Musk is trying to get rid of--as their boss.