Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms
De : candycanearter07 (at) *nospam* candycanearter07.nomail.afraid (candycanearter07)
Groupes : alt.comp.os.windows-11 comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 10. Mar 2025, 19:20:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : the-candyden-of-code
Message-ID : <slrnvsuatb.1p8fk.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote at 21:56 this Thursday (GMT):
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 08:23:42 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote:
>
Windows 11 has nothing in common with Windows 3.0.
>
Oh, it has plenty in common. Drive letters, default extensions for finding
executables, crap .BAT files, “reserved” file names (anybody know what
they are?), tendency to become flaky over time, difficulties with multi-
tasking ...
>
And that’s just off the top of my head.


I know COM and LPT.
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

Date Sujet#  Auteur
16 Feb 25 * Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms43Johnny LaRue
16 Feb 25 +- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Adison Vohn Caterson
16 Feb 25 +* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms17rbowman
17 Feb 25 i+- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1rbowman
17 Feb 25 i+* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms14Anton Shepelev
17 Feb 25 ii+* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms8rbowman
20 Feb 25 iii`* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms7Anton Shepelev
20 Feb 25 iii +- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Kerr-Mudd, John
20 Feb 25 iii `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms5rbowman
20 Feb 25 iii  `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms4Frank Slootweg
21 Feb 25 iii   `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms3Daniel70
21 Feb 25 iii    +- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Frank Slootweg
24 Feb 25 iii    `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Daniel70
17 Feb 25 ii`* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms5Kerr-Mudd, John
20 Feb 25 ii +* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms3Anton Shepelev
20 Feb 25 ii i`* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms2Kerr-Mudd, John
20 Feb 25 ii i `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Anton Shepelev
20 Feb 25 ii `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Anton Shepelev
18 Feb 25 i`- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Daniel70
17 Feb 25 +* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms14Chris
17 Feb 25 i+* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms8Chris
21 Feb 25 ii`* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Feb 25 ii `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Feb 25 ii  `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms5Paul
21 Feb 25 ii   +* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms2Frank Slootweg
21 Feb 25 ii   i`- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Paul
21 Feb 25 ii   `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Feb 25 ii    `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Paul
20 Feb 25 i+* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Feb 25 ii+* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms2Mark Lloyd
21 Feb 25 iii`- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1DFS
10 Mar 25 ii`- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1candycanearter07
21 Feb 25 i`- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Paul
17 Feb 25 +* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms9Anton Shepelev
17 Feb 25 i+* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms3Kerr-Mudd, John
20 Feb 25 ii`* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms2Anton Shepelev
20 Feb 25 ii `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Chris Ahlstrom
20 Feb 25 i`* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Feb 25 i `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms4rbowman
21 Feb 25 i  `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms3Kerr-Mudd, John
21 Feb 25 i   `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Feb 25 i    `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Paul
20 Feb 25 `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal