Re: Shocking speed difference, Ubuntu vs. Linux Mint, Snap vs. Flatpak

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Shocking speed difference, Ubuntu vs. Linux Mint, Snap vs. Flatpak
De : ronb02NOSPAM (at) *nospam* gmail.com (RonB)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 20. Mar 2025, 06:34:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <slrnvtna7k.hpf.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
On 2025-03-19, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-03-19 00:58, RonB wrote:
On 2025-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Having discovered that Ubuntu intends to replace the GNU utilities with
Rust equivalents which may or may not work as well in the coming months,
I switched over to Linux Mint 22.1 from Ubuntu 24.04 on this old Macbook
Air 2017. Not only does it bundle the necessary, proprietary wireless
drivers allowing for a smooth install unlike Ubuntu, but Linux Mint runs
a _lot_ faster under Cinnamon than Ubuntu's implementation of GNOME. I
imagine that most of it is due to the use of Snap. For example,
LibreOffice went from taking about ten seconds to load (on a cold start)
to one or two.
>
I can only hope that Linux Mint does not follow Ubuntu in removing the
GNU utilities in favour of the rewritten Rust ones. They have already
shown themselves to be less than 100% compatible, so you can imagine
what kind of chaos will result from the change.
 
I'm finding out that the Firefox Snap can't read files in the non-local user
directory and Flatpaks can't work with applications outside of their
directory. I also can't (or don't know how) to customize the Snap version of
Firefox. I think AppImage is the best of the three.
>
While AppImage does a stellar job, the reality is that it doesn't have
the security features of Flatpak or Snap. If I had to choose between the
three, Flatpak looks like it is far and beyond the best compromise.

Okay, I don't know enough about it to contradict you. It's probably Snap and
Flatpaks security features that get in the way of applications working
properly. So another reason not to like Snap. I'll reserve judgment on
Flatpak because I found a workaround for Trelby's PDF issue and, I'm
guessing, the person who made the Trelby Flatpak probably left something
out.

At any rate I "found" (someone told me at the GitHub site) that you can give
Trelby access to the /tmp directory and it will allow you to use the default
PDF application. So it's a workaround, but it works.

Just type (or copy and paste) into the terminal...

flatpak override --user --filesystem=/tmp org.trelby.Trelby

I still don't know how to customize a Snap version of Firefox, however. And
I still don't like that Snaps appear as "partitions" when you run a df
command. I've removed all Snaps from my computers.

There might be another reason Linux Mint is faster. LM defaults to X11
instead of Wayland. On my (older) machines Wayland leaves artifacts (is
blotchy in the dark parts of videos, which I guess are artifacts). X11
doesn't do this.
 
Change isn't always for the better.
>
Ubuntu 24.04 still uses X11. It seems to default to Wayland after that
release. The slow performance really does seem to be the result of Snap
since even the interface itself shouldn't be slower as it is also based
on GTK3 like Cinnamon.

I'm pretty sure Ubuntu 24.04 defaults to Wayland. But I may be wrong about
that. I think I had to disable Wayland the last time I tried a desktop
version of Ubuntu.

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien

Date Sujet#  Auteur
19 Mar 25 * Re: Shocking speed difference, Ubuntu vs. Linux Mint, Snap vs. Flatpak9RonB
20 Mar 25 +* Re: Shocking speed difference, Ubuntu vs. Linux Mint, Snap vs. Flatpak5rbowman
20 Mar 25 i+* Re: Shocking speed difference, Ubuntu vs. Linux Mint, Snap vs. Flatpak2RonB
20 Mar 25 ii`- Re: Shocking speed difference, Ubuntu vs. Linux Mint, Snap vs. Flatpak1rbowman
20 Mar 25 i`* Re: Shocking speed difference, Ubuntu vs. Linux Mint, Snap vs. Flatpak2rbowman
21 Mar 25 i `- Re: Shocking speed difference, Ubuntu vs. Linux Mint, Snap vs. Flatpak1rbowman
20 Mar 25 `* Re: Shocking speed difference, Ubuntu vs. Linux Mint, Snap vs. Flatpak3RonB
20 Mar 25  +- Re: Shocking speed difference, Ubuntu vs. Linux Mint, Snap vs. Flatpak1rbowman
21 Mar 25  `- Re: Shocking speed difference, Ubuntu vs. Linux Mint, Snap vs. Flatpak1RonB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal