Sujet : Re: GIMP 3.0.0 Is Here!
De : TJ (at) *nospam* noneofyour.business (TJ)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 24. Mar 2025, 16:20:24
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vrrt7o$15da7$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2025-03-24 10:53, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2025-03-24 10:17, TJ wrote:
On 2025-03-22 09:16, Lester Thorpe wrote:
Outwardly, the only difference is that the UI is now based in
GTK3 and hence it is themeable. Who has the fucking time to
fiddle with themes?
>
But virtually all criticisms of the GIMP are directed to the
UI as if the UI is somehow highly significant.
>
A true image pro wouldn't even notice the UI but the hordes
of dilettantes certainly do.
>
>
>
I wasn't aware that one had to be a "true image pro" to use GIMP. Good to know.
>
Guess that means I'll have to stop. I'm not now, nor have I ever been, a "true image pro." That must be why I hate the dark theme that's been the UI default for some time. I find it distracting. First thing I do when installing on a new computer is restore it to the lighter "System" theme. Sacrilege.
>
I'm a farmer, and I've been mistakenly using GIMP for years to prepare planning maps that show what I want to plant where on my diversified farm. They use a satellite photo as a base, with color-coded fields drawn on it as overlaying layers, labeled with the size in acres.
>
Very useful when describing the plan to those entrusted with carrying it out. But now I have to give all that up, because GIMP is only for "true image pros."
I imagine that the tone of what's written above is sarcastic, but if you aren't already aware, Larry "Lester Thorpe Diego Garcia Fabian Russell" Pietraskiewicz is a laughing stock. Stéphane Carpentier seems to come to Usenet strictly to make fun of him and his poor ideas.
My part was indeed sarcasm, but I must be losing my edge if there was doubt about that. I used to be much better at it. Maybe I wasn't annoyed quite enough yet.
As for Lester, I know nothing of him, other than the ridiculously elitist message that started this thread. I don't usually frequent this group, but I failed to notice it was the only one in the followup field when I replied to the message on comp.os.linux.misc.
TJ