Liste des Groupes | Revenir à col advocacy |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:And yet you weren't able to show that.On 2025-03-25 11:54, Joel wrote:But if I *didn't* have the whole 32 GB, Alan, the RAM would getChris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:>
>>the [Linux] OS us[ed] swap, when main RAM and cache>
saturated the 32 GB.
That doesn't actually mean you *need* 32GB.
Oh sure, I'll just rely on swap! Great, back to the 1990s, heh.
What you showed was 25GB usage and some of that was caching.
>
You were nowhere NEAR needing swap space.
saturated rather quickly, leading to use of swap.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.