Re: Apple requires too much money and sacrifice of control

In article <b2t8uj1mt9jkrvhhqrbo3i1909bmn908g9@4ax.com>,
 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:

 

You really overstepped, with this one, Winblows is far more advanced
than anything Apple actually created in their OS, they borrowed BSD's
brain for the hard parts.   The Apple-specific features of macOS are
fairly laughable, in truth, although I can understand some people just
prefer the platform, flushing money down the toilet to get it.

So what then is Linux?   That also "borrowed Unix's brain for the hard
parts". 

The GUIs that Linux has come up with ARE laughable.   Mostly bad copies
of Windows.   MacOS GUI is totally unique.

Windows is an extremely primitive OS.   In fact, it is the only fully
proprietary OS remaining.   Everything else is Unix-based.   Linux,
Android, iOS, MacOS, Apple watches.   Linux/Unix even runs on
mainframes. 

Windows runs only on Windows PC.   Nothing else.  Because it is neither
portable nor scalable.   Unix was both from the very beginning.   Look
how long it has taken to get Windows running on Arm.  And it is still
not perfect.  

But MacOS has gone thru 3 processor changes.  PPC to Intel to Arm.   All
very well done.   Because Unix is scalable and portable. 

And you flush money down the toilet to buy a Windows PC and then flush
time down the toilet installing Linux.  What is your point?