Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS?
De : nospam (at) *nospam* needed.invalid (Paul)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy alt.comp.os.windows-11
Date : 28. Mar 2025, 01:25:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vs4q9s$1f4r1$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Ratcatcher/2.0.0.25 (Windows/20130802)
On Thu, 3/27/2025 6:26 PM, vallor wrote:
On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 22:20:00 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <vs4iug$186dc$1@dont-email.me>:
 
Seems Microsoft is bringing back the option for ordinary Windows users
to format volumes as ReFS
<https://www.tomshardware.com/software/windows/new-advanced-filesystem-
format-option-found-in-windows-11-preview-build-refs-supports-up-to-35-
petabytes>.
>
This filesystem made its first appearance years ago, but then Microsoft
began removing the option for using it from various non-“Enterprise”
versions of Windows where it had been introduced.
>
NTFS is certainly showing its age. But it’s not clear that ReFS is
really enough to take Windows forward. It seems a bit lacklustre
compared to the options that have long been available on Linux, for
example.
 
I reported on ReFS a month or two ago, when I tried it with my (then)
new Windows 11 Pro Workstation virtual host.
 
It wasn't resizable.  I wrote it off as a primitive toy, and reformated
the partition with NTFS.
 

It's got a lotta versions, but I bet not much has changed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ReFS

   3.14: Default version formatted by Windows 11 (build 26047 and newer).[23]

And yeah, I just bought a 35 petabyte hard drive yesterday.
What a coincidence :-)

   Paul

Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Mar 25 * Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS?20Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Mar 25 +* Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS?12vallor
28 Mar 25 i`* Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS?11Paul
28 Mar 25 i +* Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS?2Daniel70
28 Mar 25 i i`- Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS?1...w¡ñ§±¤ñ
28 Mar 25 i `* Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS?8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Mar 25 i  +* Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS?4Paul
29 Mar 25 i  i`* Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS?3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Mar 25 i  i `* Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS?2Paul
29 Mar 25 i  i  `- Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS?1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Mar 25 i  `* Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS?3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Mar 25 i   `* Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS?2Paul
29 Mar 25 i    `- Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS?1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Mar 25 `* Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS?7Farley Flud
28 Mar 25  +- Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS?1Paul
29 Mar 25  `* Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS?5Borax Man
29 Mar 25   `* Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS?4Paul
29 Mar 25    +- Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS?1Borax Man
29 Mar 25    `* Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS?2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Mar 25     `- Re: Is Microsoft Trying To Revive ReFS?1Borax Man

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal