Sujet : Re: Favorite Font
De : ronb02NOSPAM (at) *nospam* gmail.com (RonB)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 13. Apr 2025, 04:25:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <slrnvvmbl5.v7a.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
On 2025-04-12, Borax Man <
rotflol2@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 2025-04-12, L Thorpe <lt666@sixsixsix.net> wrote:
This is not a frivolous issue.
>
There are many fonts available on GNU/Linux but the only font
that I continually select for all my GUI apps and even virtual
terminals is the Liberation family:
>
https://github.com/liberationfonts/liberation-fonts
>
IMO, the Liberation fonts are the best and every other font
seems quite ugly or unsatisfying in comparison.
>
Liberation also has extensive Unicode coverage but that is
not the main point of concern.
>
To me, this is unusual. Why should one font family be so
far ahead, aesthetically speaking?
>
Surely there are other candidates but I have found none
that appeal to me so greatly as does Liberation.
>
What are the experiences of others? What are YOUR favorite
fonts for general application use, especially in word processors
or text editors?
>
I am tempted to exclude all the dozens of GNU/Linux fonts
except for Liberation. Do you feel the same?
>
>
My .Xresources lists Cousine and Inconsolata, as well as for some
programs, Spleen.
>
There is another that I use on emacs for my desktop, but as I'm not near
it, and can't look it up, and I can't recall it.
When I use Emacs I use Courier Screenplay, but I only use Emacs with the
Fountain-Mode plugin (which is used for screenplay formatting).
-- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien