Re: (OT) They're not all crazy in Europe

CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

On 4/18/25 17:01, Sn!pe wrote:

RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
 

On 2025-04-18, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote:

RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>

On 2025-04-17, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:

RonB wrote:
>

Hungary makes it official: only two genders, end of debate
>
The parliament in Hungary has passed a constitutional amendment
recognizing only two genders ? male and female. The decision was
supported by 140 lawmakers, with 21 voting against and no
abstentions.
>
The revised constitution states:
  
   "Hungary protects marriage as a union between a man and a woman,
   and the family as the foundation of the nation. A person is either
   male or female. A father is a man, a mother is a woman."

>
Strange that it even needs to be spelled-out, eh?
>

It's amazing that common sense has to be codified in this Woke world.
Britain's Supreme Court seems to have to made the same decision.

>
That's *really* amazing, since Britain's now a shithole where posting
reasonable opinions online can get you arrested and jailed.

>
I'm pretty sure that, in Britain, they'll probably change the law.
They're that far gone with this Woke stupidity.
>

>
Have you been to Britain, RonB?
>

>
Nope. But I can read.
>

 
 From where have you gained your information, RonB?  Is it
a trustworthy, authoritative and timely source of British news?
>

>
The "trustworthy," "authoritative" sources we are encouraged to use by
our respective government always lie by omission. Here in Canada, CBC
routinely removes details, as do CTV, Global and even the local LCN. The
only way you will really know what's going on is if you get your news through
a combination of the mainstream garbage and independent sources.
You always have to use the latter to confirm.
 

I always take all my news with a big pinch of salt, not to say a
cynical, distrusting approach.  I form my opinions by gleaning
information from as many independent sources as I can, giving
due weight to their reputation for trustworthiness. 

IMHO "Rebelnews" does not inspire trust.

I abhor bigotry.

>
If you only rely on traditional broadcast or print news, you will always
be grossly misinformed. Look at Stéphane, for example, he's been
convinced that a

[what follows is irrelevant]

"vaccine" that caused my sister-in-law, my best friend and her co-worker
to develop uteran cancer and need to have their reproductive system is
_safe_. He's telling us that the injection that caused the cousin of my
former brother-in-law and his wife to develop cancer is helpful. The
pharmaceutical industry was definitely not responsible for my wife's
subordinate developing myocarditis requiring her to stay in the hospital
for week and half!
 
With such a brilliant perspective, it should be no wonder why France is
quickly turning into yet another Muslim caliphate.

--
^Ï^.      Sn!pe, PTB, FIBS        My pet rock Gordon just is.