Liste des Groupes | Revenir à col advocacy |
On 4/18/25 16:48, RonB wrote:On 2025-04-18, Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> wrote:>On 2025-04-18, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 10:14:54 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:>
>The desktops being roughly similar is only a necessity for users who>
were already old when they learned MacOS or Windows and did so
stubbornly. Considering how difficult it was for them to adopt that
much, you wouldn't want to put an entirely different operating system in
front of them. For anyone else, a switch from Windows to Gnome or
Cinnamon shouldn't be such a chore.
On Linux, “different GUIs” is not the same as “different operating
systems”. Linux offers more variety of GUIs than all the rest of the
computing world put together.
Wont the obsolence of X11 put and end to that? Many Desktop
Environments and Window Managers won't work at all on Wayland, from what
I understand.
Hopefully X11 will be around for a couple more decades. It's getting close
to two decades since Wayland was first announced and it still doesn't seem
completely ready to me.
It's not ready in Linux Mint, but that's because Cinnamon hasn't been
rewritten to work with it yet. If you use KDE or Gnome through Fedora or
Ubuntu, Wayland is quite excellent. You might not notice a difference if
your use is basic, but if you enjoy touchpad gestures, decent external
monitor support and things like the night light, it's definitely better
than X11.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.