Re: NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-575.51.02.run

On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 15:53:19 -0700, % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote in
<01mdnWqhwNj5UZv1nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>:
 

vallor wrote:

On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 14:48:10 -0700, % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote in
<9q6cnbqpvriCIJv1nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>:
>

vallor wrote:

On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 13:33:57 -0700, % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote in
<ioidncTqmowrNpv1nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com>:
>

vallor wrote:

On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 06:17:00 -0700, % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote
in <2gadnSM96OTP2Jv1nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>:
>

vallor wrote:

(I usually mention which NVIDIA binary blob I'm using, but it
hasn't changed from the release drivers for several iterations.)
>

so you broke that too

>
Nothing is "broken".
>
BTW, there's a new set of drivers from the NVIDIA web site -- a new
release driver and a new beta.  I'm now running the beta.
>
I still had to "skip-module-load" like this:
>
./NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-575.51.02.run --skip-module-load
>
(Something to do with module dependencies.)
>

and you use this application to do what ... exactly

>
The video drivers are used to drive the video.
>
Without the video drivers, you won't have graphics for your gui, or
to to play kick-ass games like Elite Dangerous: Trailblazers.
>

didn't your computer come with video drivers

>
Very, very old ones.
>
Anybody using a discrete video card is most likely keeping up with
video drivers.  NVIDIA and RADEON are two such examples.
>

and this is to play a game

 That is one use of video drivers.
 Another -- which you are probably more familiar with -- is
to display a gui for drooling over Usenet posts, Youtube,
and whatever else you fancy to look at.