Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court

In article <dr5s0kt8p4bi3uldqmho0e0pk2v4a5lvgj@4ax.com>,
Joel  <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:

doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>

US laws have no implication in Canada.

>
You're referring to my sig as if it's part of my argument about trans
rights in Canada?  What gives?
>
-- Joel W. Crump
>
Amendment XIV
Section 1.
>
[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
>
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

>
That law has nothing to do with Canadian Politics.

>
>
I was talking about something other than my sig, you are ignoring
that.  So your response has nothing to do with any post in any group
in this thread.
>

 Then why bring up US Law in can.politics?
 

-- Joel W. Crump
>
Amendment XIV
Section 1.
>
[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
>
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.