Re: Linux 6.14.4

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Linux 6.14.4
De : pursent100 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (%)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 27. Apr 2025, 20:53:12
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <XcmdnRgrasiwFpP1nZ2dnZfqnPYAAAAA@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
vallor wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 07:57:58 -0700, % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote in
<3QednT9AFaVr2JP1nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>:
 
vallor wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 20:11:45 -0700, % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote in
<N-mdnXdlNNDoPZD1nZ2dnZfqnPEAAAAA@giganews.com>:
>
vallor wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 16:35:16 -0700, % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote in
<DBCdnaQsKJ9c8JD1nZ2dnZfqn_oAAAAA@giganews.com>:
>
vallor wrote:
$ uname -a Linux lm 6.14.4 #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Apr 26 15:14:33 PDT 2025
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
real 410.52 user 19225.83 sys 3986.17
>
# ./NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-575.51.02.run --skip-module-load
>
Showing that the NVIDIA beta drivers work with the kernel, and the
kernel builds without errors.  (There were 8 warnings, but they were
all regarding -Wframe-larger-than 1024.)
>
and your posts still look the same
>
Look again -- the User-Agent: header and signature changed!
>
big deal it still looks the same
>
That's good -- if it looked different, it would be a bug.
>
🪲️
>
it's a good thing you're doing all this ,
it shows me what i can do later ,
when i got nothing left
 So...you think all I do is build Linux kernels and post about it?
 Could you be any more wrong?
 
its all i ever see you do and nothing changes

Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Apr 25 * Linux 6.14.48vallor
27 Apr 25 `* Re: Linux 6.14.47%
27 Apr 25  `* Re: Linux 6.14.46vallor
27 Apr 25   `* Re: Linux 6.14.45%
27 Apr 25    `* Re: Linux 6.14.44vallor
27 Apr 25     `* Re: Linux 6.14.43%
27 Apr 25      `* Re: Linux 6.14.42vallor
27 Apr 25       `- Re: Linux 6.14.41%

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal