Re: What?s Your Candidate For Stupidest Microsoft Bug?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: What?s Your Candidate For Stupidest Microsoft Bug?
De : this (at) *nospam* ddress.is.invalid (Frank Slootweg)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy alt.comp.os.windows-11
Date : 30. Apr 2025, 18:37:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NOYB
Message-ID : <vutu60.9jo.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net>
References : 1
User-Agent : tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-10.0-WOW/2.8.0(0.309/5/3) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
From the ?Ripley?s Believe It Or Not? of software bugs: Windows users
who chose a plain desktop background instead of a picture found their
login process taking longer -- instead of getting to their desktop
within a few seconds, it could take up to 30 seconds.
 
Why? It turned out that the login system was waiting for a
notification that all desktop components had loaded. The desktop
background component sent this notification after loading a picture,
but somehow the code path for a plain background colour forgot this
notification.
 
These are the sorts of stupidities in Dimdows that are slipping
through QA testing these days.
 
<https://www.tomshardware.com/software/windows/windows-7-users-with-a-solid-background-color-faced-delayed-login-process-it-took-four-months-for-microsoft-to-fix>

  <barf!>

  Are you for real!? Whingeing about a corner-case (non-)bug, *16 YEARS*
after the fact!?

  Same goes for the 'author' of the referenced 'article'.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
30 Apr 25 * What’s Your Candidate For Stupidest Microsoft Bug?3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Apr 25 +- Re: What’s Your Candidate For Stupidest Microsoft Bug?1Paul
30 Apr 25 `- Re: What?s Your Candidate For Stupidest Microsoft Bug?1Frank Slootweg

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal