Sujet : Re: Microsoft admits 30% of code not written by humans
De : fsquared (at) *nospam* fsquared.linux (Farley Flud)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy alt.comp.os.windows-11Date : 02. May 2025, 12:02:57
Autres entêtes
Organisation : UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com
Message-ID : <183bb0e4d2eae483$90466$1520955$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Pan/0.146 (Hic habitat felicitas; d7a48b4 gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pan.git)
On Fri, 02 May 2025 01:52:15 -0400, ...winston wrote:
It would be a stretch(leap of faith/pipe dream/ignorance) to claim that
replacing humans, support, sales, software development with AI code
during the DOS days....
>
Some form of AI has existed perhaps since the beginning of civilization.
For example, all word processors and accounting software packages are
usually bundled with a plethora of boilerplate documents to suit a variety
of purposes. Do you think the average office worker will create a dunning
letter from scratch? That would be highly unlikely. Rather they will select
a standard dunning boilerplate and perhaps modify it slighly. Does that
seem quiite like current AI?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boilerplate_textThere is very little human creativity taking place on a daily basis
around the world. Most is just rehearsed and rehashed standard formulas,
and the current digital AI trend just naturally fits into it all.
-- Hail Linux! Hail FOSS! Hail Stallman!