Re: Microsoft admits 30% of code not written by humans

On Thu, 5/1/2025 7:16 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:

On 2025-05-01 10:58, rbowman wrote:

On Thu, 1 May 2025 08:56:39 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
>

The fact that AI can produce code can be useful for people learning how
to program, but you want that human touch either way. I would bet that
AI is not as concerned as humans are in the quality of the code.

>
That's becoming a cliche on the Arduino subreddit. A newbie will wander in
with a pile of crap generated by ChatGPT and want help figuring out why it
doesn't work.
>
https://www.theregister.com/2025/04/30/openai_pulls_plug_on_chatgpt
>
So much for the kinder, gentler AI.

 
I'm not even sure why we've all been pushing for AI anyway.
The Matrix pretty much made it clear how we fare in the
eventual war against the machines we created.
 

The current machines, are not the machines you have to fear.

In one recent test, one robot was used to trick three
other robots, to leave their guard post and go with it.
The robots are worse than small children, at being
manipulated. If offered candy, they will get in the
back seat of a strangers car. (Hint: They're not that
clever. They're as dumb as rocks.)

What you really have to fear, is when AGI shows up.
It's not here yet. AGI is like Fusion, as a topic.
Everyone knows Fusion is right around the corner.

I'm not saying this, because I don't have concerns. It's
just that the appearances currently, do not impress.
I'm sure the Codex machine is mighty impressive.
But, does it think ? Or is it basically just like
all the other LLM at some things. Dumb as a rock.

   Paul