Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome

On 2025-05-03, Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> wrote:

On 2025-05-02, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:

On 2025-04-30, Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> wrote:

On 2025-04-29, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:

On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:21:25 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com>
wrote in <slrn1011o35.46v.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>:
>

On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

On 2025-04-29 02:15, RonB wrote:

On 2025-04-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

On 2025-04-28 16:01, RonB wrote:

On 2025-04-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:49:54 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
>

I'll admit that I didn't notice all of what installing Snaps did
to my machine, but I could definitely tell that it was a mess.

>
You don't want to run 'df -a'.  I'm up to /dev/loop62 for snap
stuff.

>
It took me a while to root all that snap crap out of my system, but
I think I've got it all cleared now.
>
>

There is a script you can use to automatically rid your system of it.
A quick search on your engine of choice will find it for you. Heck,
it comes up at the top of the results in Brave Search.

 
If I get more involved with Ubuntu I'll look it up. I was just happy
to be wrong about some of my Ubuntu and Wayland assumptions. Ubuntu is
not going to become my "go to" Linux distribution. It was more in the
line of... "even the Linux 'flavor' I don't particularly like is
pretty good." (I'm still not a fan of Gnome 3.)

>
I wasn't a fan, but I was happy to use it because I'm a fan of Ubuntu's
interface. However, I won't bother with it if the contributors are
proud members of Antifa.
>
>

They are?  Thats a concern if true.
 
I'm not sure why Antifa are not labelled as a terrorist organisation,
they fit the definition.

>
That's because Antifa -- literally "Anti-fascist" -- isn't an organization.
It's a movement -- like skateboarding.
>
And I love it when people invoke Antifa (anti-fascists) as a boogieman;
then you know where they stand.  For example:  Eisenhower was "Antifa".
Oooo, scary.
>

>
The "antifa" of today have nothing to do with Eisenhower, and you know
it.
>
Its a movement, like drug cartels.
>
You know, North Korea calls itself a democracy. IT must be one, its in
the name...

>
Heck, even Germany claims to be a "democracy" but they're "intelligence" arm
has just declared the most popular party in Germany, AfD, "extremist" —
which is probably their first step in banning Germans' voting choice in
upcoming elections. Look what "democracies" in Romania and Moldova have done
recently, banning popular office holders and candidates because they don't
toe the Woke line. And ditto the so-called "democracy" of Ukraine (totally
banning the opposition, the opposition media and jailing many of its
members). "Democracy" has many "flexible" meanings these days. Basically
dictatorship wolves in "democratic" lambs' clothing. And they're not even
really bothering to hide it any more. It's a sick joke.
>

>
>
Democracys days are numbered.  It cannot survive the diverse society our
"leaders" are creating.  We've sown the seeds for the dissolution of
freedom and unity decades ago.
>
What these people are doing, holding back Democracy is necessary if you
want a pluralistic society.  ITs rational for them to do that.  They
have to, they have no choice.  Our choice is whether we want their World
Order, or one of our own choosing.

With BRICS the Rothschild hegemony is dying. There is going to be a lot of
pain while the Empire collapses, but in the end it should make a better,
less centralized world.

--
Jesus sat with sinners: He didn't sin
with them. Know the difference.