Re: Microsoft admits 30% of code not written by humans

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Microsoft admits 30% of code not written by humans
De : daniel47 (at) *nospam* eternal-september.org (Daniel70)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy alt.comp.os.windows-11
Date : 05. May 2025, 11:22:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vva3hq$8qsp$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
On 5/05/2025 4:34 pm, rbowman wrote:
On Sun, 4 May 2025 21:25:18 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Sun, 4 May 2025 08:08:09 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
>
Much like in the United States, the high population centres have way
too much influence over who gets elected.
>
Actually, not enough. The Electoral College is deliberately designed to
minimize the value of the vote for those who live in high-population
centres, in favour of the slave-owning states.
 Er, no.
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Electoral_College
 It was designed to keep the less populated states from being totally
trampled. This state used to have 3 votes.
Similarly in Australia, of our six states and two territories, the two most populus states would have nearly 50% of the population.
In our Lower House, The House of Representatives has 150 (used to be 151 but reduced by one for the election we had over the weekend just gone) and they are based on roughly equal Electors per Division. All Divisions are up for re-election each three years max.
In our Upper House, The Senate, each of the six states, regardless of population, has 12 Senators and the two Territories have/had 2 each. Half are up for (re-)election at each Federal Election.
--
Daniel70

Date Sujet#  Auteur
2 May 25 * Re: Microsoft admits 30% of code not written by humans23Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 May 25 `* Re: Microsoft admits 30% of code not written by humans22Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 May 25  +- Re: Microsoft admits 30% of code not written by humans1Paul
4 May 25  `* Re: Microsoft admits 30% of code not written by humans20Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 May 25   +* Re: Microsoft admits 30% of code not written by humans4rbowman
4 May 25   i`* Re: Microsoft admits 30% of code not written by humans3Paul
5 May 25   i +- Re: Microsoft admits 30% of code not written by humans1rbowman
10 May 25   i `- Re: Microsoft admits 30% of code not written by humans1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 May 25   `* Re: Microsoft admits 30% of code not written by humans15Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 May 25    +* Re: Microsoft admits 30% of code not written by humans12Paul
4 May 25    i+* Re: Microsoft admits 30% of code not written by humans8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 May 25    ii+- Re: Microsoft admits 30% of code not written by humans1rbowman
4 May 25    ii+- Re: Microsoft admits 30% of code not written by humans1Daniel70
4 May 25    ii+* Re: Microsoft admits 30% of code not written by humans2rbowman
5 May 25    iii`- Re: Microsoft admits 30% of code not written by humans1rbowman
4 May 25    ii`* Re: Microsoft admits 30% of code not written by humans3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 May 25    ii `* Re: Microsoft admits 30% of code not written by humans2rbowman
5 May 25    ii  `- Re: Microsoft admits 30% of code not written by humans1Daniel70
4 May 25    i+- Re: Microsoft admits 30% of code not written by humans1rbowman
4 May 25    i`* Re: Microsoft admits 30% of code not written by humans2Daniel70
4 May 25    i `- Re: Microsoft admits 30% of code not written by humans1Paul
4 May 25    +- Re: Microsoft admits 30% of code not written by humans1rbowman
4 May 25    `- Re: Microsoft admits 30% of code not written by humans1Paul

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal