Sujet : Re: Now I've done it
De : candycanearter07 (at) *nospam* candycanearter07.nomail.afraid (candycanearter07)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 16. May 2025, 13:40:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : the-candyden-of-code
Message-ID : <slrn102ec8s.3gnpo.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
CrudeSausage <
crude@sausa.ge> wrote at 20:35 this Thursday (GMT):
On 2025-05-15 15:30, candycanearter07 wrote:
Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote at 14:24 this Wednesday (GMT):
On Wed, 14 May 2025 07:57:11 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>
Why all the fuss about making Linux front-ends friendly to n00bs?
>
>
Because, as there should have been with systemd, there should be
a fork. We should have 2 distinct versions of GNU/Linux:
>
1) GNU/Linux for dummies
>
2) GNU/Linux for competent professionals.
>
But there won't be a fork. All (99%) distros will choose to
accommodate dummies and GNU/Linux will be degraded again.
I thought Linux Mint was supposed to be that.
>
There is no reason for Linux to be complicated. Making it simple for
novices to learn it doesn't prevent people from using it in a needlessly
complicated fashion should they choose to do so.
My opinion is that there should be sane defaults, but you can still
modify things if needed.
-- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom