Sujet : Re: It's over
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 16. Jul 2024, 02:44:27
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <4bjb9jdgd62fhorf1orn9opnpcjip5stni@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
rbowman <
bowman@montana.com> wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 12:54:54 -0400, Joel wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
They won’t start “hitting the market” until customers demand them.
Dell already has this XPS 13 model.
>
Just one?
>
Just for comparison, how many Windows RT devices did they offer?
This isn't like that.
>
Before they slapped on the RT monicker, it was referred to as Windows on
ARM. Deja vu?
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_RT#First-generation_devices
Clearly, this didn't have the level of emulation that WinARM does,
they will make the games work, emulation is all that will be needed.
Making a RISC CPU recognize that it's a subset that can be twisted
into a superset with code.
I would only buy ARM hardware, unless it's for this non-ARM device I
still have.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.