Re: My week with Linux: I'm dumping Windows for Ubuntu to see how it goes

Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:

On Fri, 23 May 2025 23:20:59 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote :
 
 

Jesus Christ Chris. C'mon. Everyone knows this. It's all over the net.
And has been. For years. The letters are public. Stop being an Apple troll.
 

 
No, I don't know. I don't care about Apple. I don't have any Apple, and
I don't talk about them, I don't read about them.
 
You have to post credible evidence, about Apple batteries failing EU
testing. I live on the EU, I heard nothing. Nor that I care, but if you
say some thing, prove it!
 
I asked chatgpt, who instead talked about some radiation testing the
iphone 12 failed. Nothing about batteries failing testing by the EU.

 
Carlos,
 
It's been a matter of public record for *years* since it's an EU directive.
 
 
As I recall, we discussed this ad infinitum on *both* newsgroups.
 <https://tinyurl.com/nova-comp-mobile-android>
 <https://tinyurl.com/nova-misc-phone-mobile-iphone
And we even discussed it on the UK ng because their rules are different.
 <https://tinyurl.com/nova-uk-telecom-mobile>

Either post links to the actual threads or to verifiable sources. If it's
an EU directive then that should be easy.

A link to a discussion you started about something you didn't evidence is
not, in itself, evidence.

It's fine if someone is ignorant of these well-published facts, as
ignorance is normal but for Chris to dispute them - that's not normal.

You have yet to show anything "published". So disputing them is childsplay.

Only fools dispute facts, especially well-published known facts.
That's why they're fools after all.
 
If anyone *still* can't find the discussions after *looking* in those
archives, then ask me to find them for you - but - expect to be frowned
upon as it's one thing to be ignorant - but it's another not to even look.

What's worse is to provide to evidence which isn't anything of the sort.
Asking ppl to do your research is disrespectful.

The correlation between ignorance & stupidity is in that sentence above.

Yes, you do demonstrate it well.