Liste des Groupes | Revenir à col advocacy |
On 2025-06-05 21:41, RonB wrote:On 2025-06-05, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:>On 2025-06-05 10:54, rbowman wrote:On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 09:27:24 -0700, Alan wrote:>
>On 2025-06-05 00:55, RonB wrote:for-On 2025-06-04, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 02:43:19 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>It is macOS that is “different” from how people expect a “Unix”>
system to behave, not the Linuxes and BSDs. Offering a choice of GUIs
(or no GUI at all), is part of how people expect a “Unix” system to
behave.
https://www.macrumors.com/2025/05/29/macos-26-rumored-to-drop-support->You're kidding, right?these-macs/>
>
I was surprised by that. Like the Windows 10 people who can't go
forward it sounds like Apple amy cause people with older Macs to go to
Linux.
Since Apple sells both the hardware and OS, it seems even more
self-serving for them to "obsolete" their older Macs — although
Microsoft might as well own the OEM PC hardware market since they have
a near strangle hold on it.
>
>
>
The latest OS is macOS Sequoia 15.5...
>
...and it's compatible with Macs going back as far as 2017.
>
8 years of support is more than reasonable
https://appleinsider.com/articles/25/05/28/macos-26-may-not-support-2018-
macbook-pros-2019-imacs-or-the-imac-pro
>
Unless you have a 2020 Intel MacBook Air...
>
That is a speculation about what "may" happen in the future.
>
Why don't we just wait a few days and find out?
It's coming from Apple Insider. I'm guessing it's probably true, considering
Apple's desire to get away from Intel CPUs. But even if not true, there's a
lot of good working Mac hardware already no longer supported. (A lot of them
are now running Linux.)
>
You mean you WANT it to be true.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.