Sujet : Re: Anyone Know of Search Superior to Google?
De : Altie (at) *nospam* BHam.com (CtrlAltDel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 12. Jun 2025, 21:10:54
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <102fc8d$2sfeb$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8)
On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 19:03:20 +0000, Farley Flud wrote:
I have tried the alternatives to Google search but they all come up with
inferior results.
In spite of its evil, grubbing nature, Google search results remain the
best.
Why, tell me why, cannot anyone else do better?
Because your type refuse to give the other ones a fair shake and don't
give them enough traffic for their algorithms to mature. Search engines
like Brave can't just magically index pages when assholes like you don't
give them keywords to stack or link analysis to analyze.
Basically, it's your fault and people like you who are to blame. Even
when a crusty droid like you visits a dork/nerd site based off a search,
the obscure and stupid sites you visit are so dated and inconsequential
that they have very few links into them from other sites.
Forget about a search engine gaining any usable function from the amount
of comments, likes, or shares a page receives when Farly Flud visits it
because you likely have no friends, no social life other than Usenet, and
don't have the required social skills needed to acquire friends and you
don't visit those types of sites.
The sites you may visit are most likely extremely outdated too, which
doesn't help at all. Add in that probably only 10 people may visit the
bizarre tech related sites you visit, in a year, and they have 1990's
layouts and loading speeds, the search engines just give the fuck up.\
It's you and people like you that cause the problems. Do better.
-- All of Usenet is in a psychological, emotional, and antisocial free fallinto an abyss and fully immersed in a drowning pool of mental illness.