Re: Python Is Bad Enough But Now There's Rust

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Python Is Bad Enough But Now There's Rust
De : boraxman (at) *nospam* geidiprime.nospam (Borax Man)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 07. Jul 2025, 12:26:53
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <slrn106nbnf.qsh.boraxman@geidiprime.bvh>
References : 1
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
On 2025-07-05, Lester Thorpe <lt@gnu.rocks> wrote:
My incomparable Gentoo system has the following Python versions
installed:
>
python-2.7.18_p16-r2
python-3.11.13
python-3.12.11
python-3.13.5
python-3.14.0_beta3
python-3.8.20_p7
>
WTF!
>
But this is no fluke.  All those versions are necessary as some
other package requires them.
>
However, now Rust is equally crazy.  Here are my Rust installed
versions:
>
rust-1.82.0
rust-1.83.0
rust-1.84.0
rust-1.85.0
rust-1.85.1
rust-1.88.0
>
Again, all are necessary somewhere.
>
But Rust packages are always very slow to build and they will
each pull in a mountain of "crates."
>
Rust, like Python but even worse, is the junk of junk.
>
This is the price that we pay so that these developer queers
can maintain their illusion of progress.
>
>
>

Rust evangelists seem to be a trojan horse for something worse.

The language is OK, but not as necessary as people make it out to be.  C
still works best as a Unix systems programming language.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Jul12:26 * Re: Python Is Bad Enough But Now There's Rust2Borax Man
7 Jul22:51 `- Re: Python Is Bad Enough But Now There's Rust1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal