Sujet : Re: MDI vs SDI. Which is Better?
De : boraxman (at) *nospam* geidiprime.nospam (Borax Man)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 12. Jul 2025, 12:38:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <slrn1074i9l.m4k.boraxman@geidiprime.bvh>
References : 1
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
On 2025-07-11, Farley Flud <
ff@linux.rocks> wrote:
The unparalleled GNU/Linux software which I utilize, including
global industrial standards like Matlab and Mathematica, all have
a SDI interface with completely independent windows.
>
If you don't know what MDI/SDI is just read about it here, dumbfuck:
>
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple-document_interface>
>
Most Micro$lop Winblows junk does use the MDI and a lot of the
junk GNU/Linux DEs like GNOME and KDE have software based on
MDI.
>
Which do you prefer? MDI or SDI?
>
It's not that that I give a flying fuck because I already know
that you are beaten distro lackey that could not exercise choice
if your life depended upon it, but I just want to get some idea
as to how how far the mainstream distro infection has penetrated.
>
I thank you in advance (for nothing).
>
Depends on the context. I'm glad they got rid of it in Microsoft
office.
Best is being able to chose whether a new document is its own windows or
not, such as being able to tear off a tab, or with Emacs, open a new
window.
I don't have a preference, only that I think SDI works most of the time,
and MDI is better in some situations where the documents are tightly
coupled.