Liste des Groupes | Revenir à col misc |
On Wed, 14 May 2025 21:39:49 +0100, Pancho wrote:Well, that is nonsense. In the UK, Police management had a history of trumping up charges of misconduct against officers who challenged institutional abuse or corruption.
People shouldn't be sacked for a whiff of anything. That encouragesThe key being credible allegations. Also, the phrase “no smoke without
false allegations.
fire” comes to mind ...
“Innocent until proven guilty” should only apply to private citizens goingNo "Innocent until proven guilty" is a fine maxim. The higher standards in public life should be codified. For instance, there is a fear that public officials could be induced to implement policies based on receiving gifts, i.e. bribes. So the higher standard in public life should be to prevent them receiving gifts, at all. They should be fired for breaching this rule, independent of any proof the gift was an inducement, a bribe. It is easier to prove they received a gift, than that the gift was effectively a bribe. However, there should be proof they received the gift. We shouldn't fire a public official just because someone makes an unsubstantiated allegation against them.
about their private affairs. Those who are elected or appointed to a
higher office with statutory power over others need to be held to a higher
standard.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.