Sujet : Re: M$ 365 Down, Again
De : robin_listas (at) *nospam* es.invalid (Carlos E.R.)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 05. Feb 2025, 11:18:45
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <5hqb7lxb81.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2025-02-05 07:33,
WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote:
On 2/4/25 4:02 PM, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Mon, 3 Feb 2025, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote:
Zeps are technically "better", but the framework
is subject to stress and can snap - even if it
was upgraded to titanium. Blimps spread the load
across the entire envelope and can thus survive
sudden wind gusts better. They may kinda fold
and shimmy, but don't snap.
>
Hmmmm ... maybe a 'hybrid' is possible now -
a blimp, but 'stiffened' a bit with like
graphite ribs so it's not SO floppy ?
>
I heard about an experimental concept that does not use a gas for lift,
but vacuum! Very fascinating!
>
More theoretical than experimental - the materials might be
possible but I don't think anyone can make them yet.
Um, no, CAN'T be made. Ever SEEN any kind of vac
vessel even slightly compromised ? INSTANT total
CRUSH. Maybe an unobtanium sphere .....
Ever seen electrical bulbs? Some are vacuum filled.
There were also electronic valves, CRT tubes...
-- Cheers, Carlos.
M$ 365 Down, Again
Re: M$ 365 Down, Again
