Re: rPI Goes Public

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col misc 
Sujet : Re: rPI Goes Public
De : 26xh.0713 (at) *nospam* e6t5y.net (26xh.0712)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.misc
Date : 29. Jun 2024, 06:02:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : zippy gate
Message-ID : <C7qcnZNvWPLGCOL7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 6/28/24 1:32 PM, rbowman wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 00:18:29 -0400, 26xh.0712 wrote:
 
    My big gripe though isn't the PI per-se, but the Pi5 reliance on the
    not/never-ready-for-prime-time Deb WORM. Four of the five main things
    I do with PIs would NOT work with WORM. Went to BeeLink boxes and
    Manjaro instead.
 I can't address Bookworm since I've studiously avoided moving my Debian
box from Bullseye. I am running Ubuntu on a BeeLink SER 4 and am happy
with it but that model is a AMD Ryzen 7 and not comparable to a Pi.
 I probably will pick up a Pi 5 at some point primarily to work with the
Pico W. I'm currently using MicroPython on the Pico and would install the
C/C++ tool chain on the Pi.
   Moved away from Ubuntu some time back ... Canonical
   just started making it too weird - all sorts of utterly
   pointless changes from solid Deb that make life more
   and more complicated.
   But now 'solid Deb' seems to have been contaminated,
   LIKELY by hiring Canonical rejects. This is breaking
   more and more things which have worked perfectly for
   over a decade - and some resist fixing by any sane
   means and I'm too damned old to basically re-write
   half the system for funzies.
   So, for now, I'm into Arch derivatives. Manjaro is
   now very good but there are a couple others I'd
   consider. My one gripe with Manjaro is the update
   model ... which quickly gets to basically reloading
   the entire 2+gb system, rather like Tumbleweed,
   and that takes time and bites into the monthly
   data allotment.
   Pi5 won't work with Bullseye or any pre-WORM
   Deb derivative - you get a nasty boot message
   if you try. Waiting for Arch that will work
   right on a Pi5, MAYbe Fedora.
   Ah : "It is possible to get Arch Linux ARM up
   and running on a Raspberry Pi 5 by removing
   U-Boot and replacing the mainline kernel with
   a directly booting kernel from the Raspberry
   Pi foundation"
   Um ... no ... what an ugly hack ... just won't
   buy another Pi5 anytime soon.
   Clearly boards like BeeLink and BMax fit into a
   different niche from Pi's - for some apps you
   WANT all those I/O pins and there's no substitute.
   However I had been using Pi's for apps that did
   not need those pins. Pi5/WORM has forced me to
   a fork in the road, Pi doesn't do it all anymore.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
12 Jun 24 * rPI Goes Public4726xh.0717
12 Jun 24 +* Re: rPI Goes Public2Andy Burns
12 Jun 24 i`- Re: rPI Goes Public1Richard Kettlewell
12 Jun 24 +- Re: rPI Goes Public1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
12 Jun 24 `* Re: rPI Goes Public43Pancho
12 Jun 24  +* Re: rPI Goes Public3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
12 Jun 24  i`* Re: rPI Goes Public2Pancho
14 Jun 24  i `- Re: rPI Goes Public126xh.0717
13 Jun 24  `* Re: rPI Goes Public39Richard Kettlewell
13 Jun 24   `* Re: rPI Goes Public38Pancho
14 Jun 24    +* Re: rPI Goes Public35Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Jun 24    i`* Re: rPI Goes Public34Pancho
14 Jun 24    i +- Re: rPI Goes Public1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Jun 24    i `* Re: rPI Goes Public32Richard Kettlewell
15 Jun 24    i  `* Re: rPI Goes Public31Pancho
15 Jun 24    i   `* Re: rPI Goes Public30Richard Kettlewell
16 Jun 24    i    +* Re: rPI Goes Public28Computer Nerd Kev
17 Jun 24    i    i`* Re: rPI Goes Public27Richard Kettlewell
28 Jun 24    i    i `* Re: rPI Goes Public2626xh.0712
28 Jun 24    i    i  `* Re: rPI Goes Public25rbowman
28 Jun 24    i    i   +* Re: rPI Goes Public10Bobbie Sellers
28 Jun 24    i    i   i+- Re: rPI Goes Public1rbowman
28 Jun 24    i    i   i+* Only you have the power (Was: rPI Goes Public)3Lew Pitcher
29 Jun 24    i    i   ii`* Re: Only you have the power (Was: rPI Goes Public)2rbowman
29 Jun 24    i    i   ii `- Re: Only you have the power (Was: rPI Goes Public)1Lew Pitcher
28 Jun 24    i    i   i+* Re: rPI Goes Public4Andy Burns
29 Jun 24    i    i   ii`* Re: rPI Goes Public3The Natural Philosopher
29 Jun 24    i    i   ii `* Re: rPI Goes Public2Lew Pitcher
29 Jun 24    i    i   ii  `- Re: rPI Goes Public1rbowman
29 Jun 24    i    i   i`- Re: rPI Goes Public1The Natural Philosopher
28 Jun 24    i    i   +- Re: rPI Goes Public1Bobbie Sellers
29 Jun 24    i    i   +* Re: rPI Goes Public1226xh.0712
29 Jun 24    i    i   i+* Re: rPI Goes Public6rbowman
29 Jun 24    i    i   ii+* Re: rPI Goes Public4D
2 Jul 24    i    i   iii`* Re: rPI Goes Public326xh.0712
2 Jul 24    i    i   iii +- Re: rPI Goes Public1D
31 Jul 24    i    i   iii `- Re: rPI Goes Public1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Jul 24    i    i   ii`- Re: rPI Goes Public126xh.0712
22 Jul 24    i    i   i+- Re: rPI Goes Public1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Jul 24    i    i   i`* Re: rPI Goes Public4Marc Haber
22 Jul 24    i    i   i +* Re: rPI Goes Public2D
5 Aug 24    i    i   i i`- Re: rPI Goes Public1Bobbie Sellers
31 Jul 24    i    i   i `- Re: rPI Goes Public1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Jun 24    i    i   `- Re: rPI Goes Public1The Natural Philosopher
17 Jun 24    i    `- Re: rPI Goes Public1Pancho
14 Jun 24    `* Re: rPI Goes Public2Richard Kettlewell
15 Jun 24     `- Re: rPI Goes Public1Pancho

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal