Sujet : Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?
De : 186283 (at) *nospam* ud0s4.net (186282@ud0s4.net)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 09. Dec 2024, 06:07:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : wokiesux
Message-ID : <W7-cnd6Me59i58v6nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@earthlink.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 12/8/24 3:18 AM, rbowman wrote:
On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 01:08:41 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
Well, Musk sells gigantic lithium batteries
I'm waiting for more accurate information but there is a rumor Musk may
pivot to hydrogen. Great, another technology with no supporting
infrastructure.
Heh heh :-)
Hydrogen is DIFFICULT to deal with in a number
of dimensions. You're right in that there's
really NO sort of infrastructure for it either.
However, at an "industrial site", creation+storage+
use might not be THAT difficult an equation.
However to get good efficiency you couldn't burn
the hydrogen - huge FUEL CELLS would be required.
Even then, considerable loss.
Anyway, NOT gonna park an H2 powered vehicle
anywhere NEAR my house.
I'd suggested a little farm of maybe 5-10 meter
radial-fiber based flywheels. Those ARE do-able
and you'd be able to get back MOST of the energy
put in. There always IS a danger of "rapid
unscheduled disassembly" with those however, hence
my advice to kinda BURY them a bit.
Mag bearings ... they oughtta last 50+ years and
are basically much lower, more robust, tech than
fuel cells. Who needs hydrogen when you've got
rotational inertia ?
Cars ? Frankly isopropanol would be a GREAT
low-polluting fuel, and less hydroscopic
than methanol or ethanol. CHEAP ways to make
it ... that's for the catalyst people to
figure out. It WOULD work with the existing
infrastructure with only a few gasket mods.