Sujet : Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1
De : 186283 (at) *nospam* ud0s4.net (186282@ud0s4.net)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 09. Jan 2025, 06:04:01
Autres entêtes
Organisation : wokiesux
Message-ID : <XPSdnbpbLvJvxeL6nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 1/8/25 4:54 AM, D wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 07/01/2025 10:43, D wrote:
Cooling kills 10x the people than warming. That is how cooling is worse than warming. As for lack of water, desalination exists and works well. Desalination can be combined excellently, with solar power to drive down cost.
>
It is suitable for intermittent sources, yes. Nuclear is even better.
This is the truth! But I am curious if solar would be a good option in say, southern spain to drive desalination, and in order to build the plants quicker, due to the politicians doing their best to still stop nuclear with the power of various regulations?
As I've said many times before - we need to use
EVERYTHING WE'VE GOT now (except coal if we can
possibly help it).
TRICK is to thwart the zealots - use energy sources
where MOST APPROPRIATE. If solar fits the bill for
certain projects, then use solar. If in a windy place
then windmills might do it. If oil-burning powerplants
are the best fit, use them. If nuke plants are to be
had, use them for big Grid stuff.
It's zealotry and fanaticism that's causing most of
the problems these days. Every faction sees THEIR
fix as the One And Only and will fight everybody else.
Logic, evidence, economics, all go Bye Bye.
And even coal, the techniques/chemistry to convert it
into methanol and ethanol are now pretty good. The
nasty sulfur and heavy metals are left behind. Some
can be re-sold for various industrial applications.