Liste des Groupes | Revenir à col misc |
On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 12:14:56 +0100, D wrote:Fascinating! Thank you for sharing!
>On Fri, 13 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote:>
>On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 11:08:02 +0100, D wrote:Probably top secret!
>Are there any techniques to resupply a sub completely under water?>
Would be fascinating if it could be managed and resupplied kind of
like a space station with rotating crews and all, being sent in
smaller submarines docking at the big one.
https://www.sandboxx.us/news/how-do-americas-nuclear-submarines-get-
resupplied-at-sea/
>
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/resupply-navy-nuclear-submarine
>
If there is some way to resupply while submerged they aren't talking
about it.
>
>
Without a doubt. My friend who served on a nuke didn't talk much about the
mission. While they frequently wound up in Holy Loch they also went into
other ports like Norfolk. You can't really keep a u-boat coming into port
a secret but they certainly didn't want anyone setting their watch by the
return of the USS Baitfish every three months.
>
At least we owe GPS to the nukes to some extent. If you're going to launch
a ballistic missile you have to know where you are. Some things you can't
keep secret:
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VLF_Transmitter_Cutler
>
We sailed past about 2 miles off shore and the rumble of what I assume
were the generators sounded like you were going to be run over by a
lobster boat any moment. (lobstermen favor very large engines with minimal
exhaust systems). Of course it's on the nautical charts as a prominent
landmark.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.