Re: Joy of this, Joy of that

On 11/30/24 1:22 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 00:19:28 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
 

On 11/29/24 4:42 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>

On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 05:06:58 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>

[Python] isn't REALLY meant for interactive web apps.

>
There are quite a few frameworks for using Python to do exactly that.

>
Yea, sort of, but they seem kinda clunky work-arounds to me.

 Really? Which ones would you describe that way? Work-arounds for what?

   Server-side, PHP is about all that's properly
   supported. The Server-Lords don't like even that,
   uses up too many cycles. They'd LIKE to see all
   the hard work done on YOUR box instead. That's
   what JS does.
   As such, you really won't find any straight-up
   Python based server-side web interpreters. What
   exists are ALL sort of kludges, some evoking
   PHP to get things done.
   And how much longer for even PHP ?
   It's money, it's politics. In the END expect
   Joe User to LOSE now that everything is going
   back to the old client/$erver model.