Sujet : Re: The joy of FORTRAN
De : bowman (at) *nospam* montana.com (rbowman)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.miscDate : 30. Sep 2024, 08:40:58
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <llv30aFa6uvU3@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 23:36:11 -0400,
186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
There's always a psychology in the computer world that immediately
embraces the "Newest/Greatest Thing"
whether it's actually good/improved or not. Shit, I remember when 'C'
was in that category ... that one DID hang on
That's something that's puzzled me all of my life and on a wider scale
than computer languages. Why does Religion X survive while Religion Y,
which is equally as plausible/implausible become an also ran? Why does C
hand on while C++ never quite lived up to its promises? Why is Pike
completely off the map? It isn't that bad of a C-like language?
Some things live the AC vs. DC wars have valid technological answers.
Others like the i86 architecture seem more like accidents at a point in
time.