Sujet : Re: The joy of FORTRAN
De : bowman (at) *nospam* montana.com (rbowman)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.miscDate : 01. Oct 2024, 02:06:32
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <lm108nFj9egU2@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
User-Agent : Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 13:08:08 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
I also briefly was paid to port FORTH to an 8086 board. Not a PC, a part
of a minicomputer. I was impressed by how small it was, but utterly
unimpressed by how you were supposed to document it.
I did several projects with FORTH. I'll agree documentation was a problem
particularly with the early BLOCK system. The good part was the ability to
create a task specific interface with almost a natural language input that
was easily extensible.
https://archive.org/details/R.G.LoeligerThreadedInterpretiveLanguagesTheirDesignAndImplementationByteBooks1981
It wasn't specifically FORTH but I found it fascinating compared to the
Wizard book. (Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs). I could
understand what Scheme was doing but a little voice kept nagging 'Why?'