Re: The Tragedy Of systemd

Lars Poulsen wrote:

Phillip Frabott wrote:

I'm not going to disagree. Systemd is complicated compared to InitV.

That being says, it always comes down to what people like and what works
for them.

 The old stuff that we remember from our youth is easy for us; to the
degree that we remember what we did 40 years ago, we don't need to read
the man pages.

This.  Familiarity with the old tends to make us dislike the new, my old knowledge was applicable across xenix, OSF/1, HPUX, AIX, multiple linux flavours