Sujet : Re: evolution of bytes, The joy of FORTRAN
De : (at) *nospam* ednolan (ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.miscDate : 03. Mar 2025, 01:25:42
Autres entêtes
Organisation : loft
Message-ID : <m2kb86Fqd8pU1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001)
In article <
vq2j3r$v1q6$2@dont-email.me>,
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 20:34:09 -0000 (UTC), John Levine wrote:
>
S/360 brought us the addressable 8 bit byte packaged into 16 bit
halfwords and 32 bit words, using the same addressing for each.
>
Did any machine offer “byte” addressability with “byte” having
any meaning
other than “8-bit quantity”?
As late as the last half of the 1980s, we ran some network operations
on a BB&N C-70 machine with 10 bit bytes. It had a unix OS and
I was able to compile stock "vi" on it (since it did not ship with it).
As I recall the tape drive device nodes were something like /dev/mt0.8
and /dev/mt0.10 depending on what kind of bytes you wanted to write to tape...
-- columbiaclosings.comWhat's not in Columbia anymore..