Sujet : Re: Fedora 42 pre-releae
De : bowman (at) *nospam* montana.com (rbowman)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 03. Apr 2025, 19:57:31
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <m5840qFe093U3@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 05:58:04 -0400, c186282 wrote:
41 is "good". Hopefully 42 will be equally good - but, these days,
it's maybe better to wait for a .1 release -
they tend to launch a tad TOO soon of late. BookWorm was the same way
- indeed seemed DEDICATED to making sure the stuff I used most
wouldn't work Also way too 'Buntu ... who the hell did they hire
??? Deb is supposed to be 'core', 'the foundation', boring but super
solid/consistent.
I think it was 39 to 40 that was a little rocky for a few weeks in the KDE
spin. There was a lot going on with Qt, KDE, and Wayland that took sorting
out. So far 42 has been a non-event. I ran through all the stuff I use
with no problems.
The only problem I've had recently was with the Raspberry Pi OS. The
kernel was optimized for RPi 5 and whatever was updated in VS Code did not
play well so I had to move back to the RPi 4 kernel.
Ubuntu had some updates Monday and they didn't break anything either.