Sujet : Re: The joy of FORTH (not)
De : news (at) *nospam* alderson.users.panix.com (Rich Alderson)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.miscDate : 25. Oct 2024, 22:16:11
Autres entêtes
Organisation : PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID : <mddiktfc290.fsf@panix5.panix.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
User-Agent : Gnus v5.7/Emacs 22.3
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> writes:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 17:13:05 -0700, Peter Flass wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 08:04:37 -0700, John Ames wrote:
... but the one has 512 KB Flash/144 KB RAM, and the other only 32
KB/16 KB.
512kiB seems to be the recommendation for MicroPython. For the 32kiB
one, I would want to use a cross-compiler for some more
resource-efficient language, like C.
Ridiculous! 32K should be more than enough to run a decent compiler
natively.
It never was. Even back in Apple II days, Apple didn't recommend using
something like a Pascal compiler on their 6502-based platform.
My first computer was a 12K (BCD charactersw) IBM 1401 running FORTRAN IV.
Better compiler writers in those days...
-- Rich Alderson news@alderson.users.panix.com Audendum est, et veritas investiganda; quam etiamsi non assequamur, omnino tamen proprius, quam nunc sumus, ad eam perveniemus. --Galen
…