Sujet : Re: Using Debian to manage a multiple OS machine
De : 186283 (at) *nospam* ud0s4.net (186282@ud0s4.net)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 24. Aug 2024, 06:43:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : vector apex
Message-ID : <ssedneQEAZdv-VT7nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 8/23/24 3:01 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 02:37:25 -0400, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
On 8/23/24 2:01 AM, vallor wrote:
>
On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 05:54:46 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <va9876$qcj0$1@dont-email.me>:
>
Actually, [Linux is] working great for gaming, as the Steam Deck
proves.
>
Great strides have been made with proton -- I can play Starfield, Elite
Dangerous Odyssey, Borderlands 3, and Tiny Tina's Wonderland.
>
People who say you can't game on Linux haven't been keeping up with the
times...
>
Ummmm ... I'd say "benchmark" ....
Let’s just say, the Steam Deck wipes the floor with the Windows-based
competition.
It IS "better" in that respect.
However I'm a tad concerned about HOW it manages
that ... how 'compatible' it is now and in the
future. "Tricks" are not always for the better.
Extreme game orientation can mean serious deficits
for OTHER apps/intentions. More or less direct
access to the hardware, video buffers, can vastly
improve 'game' speed - but DO present a number
of security risks as well.
We've also seen WayLand ... which was supposed to
provide 'much more performance' than X. Alas it
is now clear it will NEVER be ready for prime time.
Good try, but .......
Anyhow, we shall see ... the next few years will be
very informative.
For now, I'm gonna say Steam for games - but X
for everything else.