Re: I never thought of this scenario

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col misc 
Sujet : Re: I never thought of this scenario
De : gtaylor (at) *nospam* tnetconsulting.net (Grant Taylor)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.misc
Date : 08. Apr 2024, 01:36:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : TNet Consulting
Message-ID : <uuve5k$6pq$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/7/24 18:53, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
You want it to do an ARP, not a ping. Ping is routable, ARP is not.
What is the down side of ping being routable in the context of determining if an IP in the directly attached subnet is reachable or not?
The only reason I'd prefer to use ARP over ping (ICMP) is that ping can easily be filtered and may give a false negative.  While ARP more directly deals with the ARP cache and thus looking at where responses would show up even if ping is filtered.
N.B. to be able to ping something in the local directly attached subnet, ARP is going to be used to resolve the IP address to a MAC address.
--
Grant. . . .

Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Apr 24 * I never thought of this scenario159The Natural Philosopher
7 Apr 24 +- Re: I never thought of this scenario1Andy Burns
7 Apr 24 +* Re: I never thought of this scenario156The Natural Philosopher
8 Apr 24 i+* Re: I never thought of this scenario154Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Apr 24 ii+* Re: I never thought of this scenario77Grant Taylor
8 Apr 24 iii`* Re: I never thought of this scenario76Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Apr 24 iii `* Re: I never thought of this scenario75Grant Taylor
8 Apr 24 iii  `* Re: I never thought of this scenario74Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Apr 24 iii   `* Re: I never thought of this scenario73Grant Taylor
8 Apr 24 iii    `* Re: I never thought of this scenario72Lawrence D'Oliveiro
9 Apr 24 iii     `* Re: I never thought of this scenario71Grant Taylor
9 Apr 24 iii      `* Re: I never thought of this scenario70Lawrence D'Oliveiro
9 Apr 24 iii       +- Re: I never thought of this scenario1Marc Haber
9 Apr 24 iii       `* Re: I never thought of this scenario68Grant Taylor
9 Apr 24 iii        +* Re: I never thought of this scenario66Lawrence D'Oliveiro
9 Apr 24 iii        i+* Re: I never thought of this scenario3Marc Haber
10 Apr 24 iii        ii+- Re: I never thought of this scenario1Grant Taylor
10 Apr 24 iii        ii`- Re: I never thought of this scenario1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
10 Apr 24 iii        i`* Re: I never thought of this scenario62Grant Taylor
10 Apr 24 iii        i `* Re: I never thought of this scenario61Lawrence D'Oliveiro
10 Apr 24 iii        i  +* Re: I never thought of this scenario56Tauno Voipio
10 Apr 24 iii        i  i+- Re: I never thought of this scenario1D
13 Apr 24 iii        i  i`* Re: I never thought of this scenario54Lawrence D'Oliveiro
13 Apr 24 iii        i  i `* Re: I never thought of this scenario53Grant Taylor
13 Apr 24 iii        i  i  `* Re: I never thought of this scenario52Lawrence D'Oliveiro
13 Apr 24 iii        i  i   +* Re: I never thought of this scenario45Grant Taylor
15 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i`* Re: I never thought of this scenario44Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i `* Re: I never thought of this scenario43Grant Taylor
19 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i  `* Re: I never thought of this scenario42Lawrence D'Oliveiro
19 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i   `* Re: I never thought of this scenario41Marc Haber
20 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i    `* Re: I never thought of this scenario40Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     +* Re: I never thought of this scenario33Rich
20 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i`* Re: I never thought of this scenario32Richard Kettlewell
20 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i +* Re: I never thought of this scenario4Marc Haber
20 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i i`* Re: I never thought of this scenario3The Natural Philosopher
20 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i i `* Re: I never thought of this scenario2Marco Moock
20 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i i  `- Re: I never thought of this scenario1Grant Taylor
20 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i `* Re: I never thought of this scenario27Rich
20 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i  `* Re: I never thought of this scenario26Marco Moock
20 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i   `* Re: I never thought of this scenario25Rich
20 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i    +* Re: I never thought of this scenario21Rich
20 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i    i`* Re: I never thought of this scenario20Grant Taylor
20 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i    i +* Re: I never thought of this scenario11Rich
21 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i    i i`* Re: I never thought of this scenario10The Natural Philosopher
21 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i    i i +* Re: I never thought of this scenario5Grant Taylor
22 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i    i i i`* Re: I never thought of this scenario4The Natural Philosopher
22 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i    i i i +- Re: I never thought of this scenario1Marc Haber
23 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i    i i i `* Re: I never thought of this scenario2Grant Taylor
23 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i    i i i  `- Re: I never thought of this scenario1The Natural Philosopher
22 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i    i i `* Re: I never thought of this scenario4Marc Haber
22 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i    i i  +- Re: I never thought of this scenario1The Natural Philosopher
22 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i    i i  `* Re: DHCP argument ....2Jim Jackson
23 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i    i i   `- Re: DHCP argument ....1D
21 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i    i +* Re: I never thought of this scenario7The Natural Philosopher
21 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i    i i+- Re: I never thought of this scenario1Grant Taylor
23 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i    i i`* Re: I never thought of this scenario5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i    i i `* Re: I never thought of this scenario4Marc Haber
24 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i    i i  +- Re: I never thought of this scenario1Rich
26 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i    i i  `* Re: I never thought of this scenario2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i    i i   `- Re: I never thought of this scenario1Marc Haber
23 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i    i `- Re: I never thought of this scenario1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i    `* Re: I never thought of this scenario3Grant Taylor
20 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i     `* Re: I never thought of this scenario2Marco Moock
21 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     i      `- Re: I never thought of this scenario1Grant Taylor
20 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i     `* Re: I never thought of this scenario6Marc Haber
23 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i      `* Re: I never thought of this scenario5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i       `* Re: I never thought of this scenario4Marc Haber
26 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i        `* Re: I never thought of this scenario3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Apr 24 iii        i  i   i         `* Re: I never thought of this scenario2Richard Kettlewell
8 May 24 iii        i  i   i          `- Re: I never thought of this scenario1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
13 Apr 24 iii        i  i   `* Re: I never thought of this scenario6Marc Haber
15 Apr 24 iii        i  i    `* Re: I never thought of this scenario5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Apr 24 iii        i  i     `* Re: I never thought of this scenario4Rich
15 Apr 24 iii        i  i      +- Re: I never thought of this scenario1Grant Taylor
17 Apr 24 iii        i  i      `* Re: I never thought of this scenario2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 Apr 24 iii        i  i       `- Re: I never thought of this scenario1Marco Moock
10 Apr 24 iii        i  +- Re: I never thought of this scenario1Marc Haber
10 Apr 24 iii        i  `* Re: I never thought of this scenario3Grant Taylor
11 Apr 24 iii        i   +- Re: I never thought of this scenario1Marc Haber
13 Apr 24 iii        i   `- Re: I never thought of this scenario1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
9 Apr 24 iii        `- Re: I never thought of this scenario1Marc Haber
8 Apr 24 ii+* Re: I never thought of this scenario63The Natural Philosopher
8 Apr 24 iii`* Re: I never thought of this scenario62The Natural Philosopher
9 Apr 24 iii +* Re: I never thought of this scenario4Grant Taylor
9 Apr 24 iii i`* Re: I never thought of this scenario3Carlos E.R.
9 Apr 24 iii i `* Re: I never thought of this scenario2The Natural Philosopher
13 Apr 24 iii i  `- Re: I never thought of this scenario1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
9 Apr 24 iii `* Re: I never thought of this scenario57Lawrence D'Oliveiro
9 Apr 24 iii  +* Re: I never thought of this scenario2Grant Taylor
13 Apr 24 iii  i`- Re: I never thought of this scenario1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
9 Apr 24 iii  `* Re: I never thought of this scenario54The Natural Philosopher
13 Apr 24 iii   `* Re: I never thought of this scenario53Lawrence D'Oliveiro
13 Apr 24 iii    +* Re: I never thought of this scenario46Grant Taylor
15 Apr 24 iii    i`* Re: I never thought of this scenario45Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Apr 24 iii    i +* Re: I never thought of this scenario40Grant Taylor
19 Apr 24 iii    i i`* Re: I never thought of this scenario39Lawrence D'Oliveiro
19 Apr 24 iii    i i +* Re: I never thought of this scenario15Marc Haber
19 Apr 24 iii    i i i+* Re: I never thought of this scenario2Grant Taylor
19 Apr 24 iii    i i ii`- Re: I never thought of this scenario1Rich
20 Apr 24 iii    i i i`* Re: I never thought of this scenario12Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 Apr 24 iii    i i i +* Re: I never thought of this scenario7Rich
20 Apr 24 iii    i i i `* Re: I never thought of this scenario4Marc Haber
19 Apr 24 iii    i i `* Re: I never thought of this scenario23The Natural Philosopher
15 Apr 24 iii    i `* Re: I never thought of this scenario4Marc Haber
13 Apr 24 iii    `* Re: I never thought of this scenario6The Natural Philosopher
8 Apr 24 ii+* Re: I never thought of this scenario3Carlos E.R.
8 Apr 24 ii`* Re: I never thought of this scenario10Andy Burns
8 Apr 24 i`- Re: I never thought of this scenario1The Natural Philosopher
7 Apr 24 `- Re: I never thought of this scenario1Marco Moock

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal