Sujet : Re: The joy of FORTRAN
De : Pancho.Jones (at) *nospam* proton.me (Pancho)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.misc alt.folklore.computersDate : 26. Sep 2024, 08:42:32
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vd3398$3j9t$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 9/25/24 16:03, Scott Lurndal wrote:
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> writes:
rbowman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 11:03:13 +0800, Woozy Song wrote:
>
When I went to uni in the 70s, the computer science lecturer had a
hard-on for Pascal, the latest and greatest. Always slipped in snide
remarks about BASIC or COBOL in most classes.
>
Better Pascal than Modula/Modula-2. I swear as soon as anybody figured
out how to do anything useful with one of his languages Wirth designed a
new, more obscure version.
>
https://www.modula2.org/tutor/chapter8.php
>
Chapter 8 - Input/Output
In preparation
>
That sums it up. I've heard Wirth's languages described as programs that
are designed to tell secrets to themselves.
>
Wirth: His name is pronounced "virth" if by reference, and "worth" if by value.
>
I found the original Pascal to be confining.
>
VAX-11 Pascal, on the other hand, was wonderful. Enough useful
extensions to make it a very viable systems programming language.
Indeed, but a bitch to work out how to call Vax C from Vax Pascal, or vice versa. Life was so much harder before search engines and the internet.
…