Sujet : Re: The pain of Excel
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.misc alt.folklore.computersDate : 28. Sep 2024, 00:41:54
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vd7fs1$tdq8$11@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 17:43:31 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
Yes, I got into them early - and found it was a short easy step to CSV,
so now my stuff can be read by the people in spreadsheet land. I have,
however, had to put a fair amount of effort into what I call
"Excel-proofing" my data, since our favourite Redmond software company
loves meddling with it.
I found, years ago, that outputting SYLK format was a fairly robust
way of generating data for use by the spreadsheet folks. But that
doesn’t seem to be well-known these days.
Trying to “Excel-proof” data is generally regarded as a futile
exercise. The logical answer would be “use a better tool than Excel”,
but there seems to be a Gresham’s Law of IT interoperability, where
the mediocre, Microsoft-based product pushes out the higher-quality
alternatives ...
<
https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008984>