Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col misc 
Sujet : Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]
De : Pancho.Jones (at) *nospam* proton.me (Pancho)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.misc
Date : 01. Oct 2024, 15:57:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vdh2l1$2p7e2$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 9/30/24 22:19, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 10:24:30 +0100, Pancho wrote:
 
On 9/30/24 00:15, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
C3 linearization
>
Never heard of that before. It sounds far to difficult to understand in
practice.
 But it makes the difference between multiple inheritance that
bewilders and confuses people, and multiple inheritance which makes
sense. It’s what lets Python have multiple inheritance that makes
sense.
Single inheritance bewilders and confuses people, that is why we have rules for good practice to favour composition over inheritance, to avoid obscuring what the code does. The idea being to avoid deep hierarchies.
There is a difference between a consistent implementation of multiple inheritance and something that people actually understand when coding, or maintaining code.
In essence just because you can do something clever, doesn't mean you should.

 Think about why languages like Java and PHP avoided multiple
inheritance, and substituted those lame “interfaces” instead: it was
to avoid this bewilderment and confusion that is known to plague C++,
because the right solution wasn’t known at the time.
 
I quite like interfaces, polymorphism through interfaces. I was generally happier to do a bit of extra code, reimplementing a conflicted interface than I would be having to understand a clever linearization (total ordering).
However I never developed libraries and so so these concepts may be less important for me. There may be pathological cases where it is sensible.

Once you read the description, you realize it’s the only right way to
do things, and you wonder why everybody wasn’t already doing it this
way.
 Here is the paper: “A Monotonic Superclass Linearization for Dylan”
<http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.19.3910&rep=rep1&type=pdf>
I had a look, it would take me a while to work through the algorithm, establish how the ideas sit in the more common language of DAGs and graph theory. If there is a significant difference that requires new terms such as monotonic.
And, ... that is all hugely easier than considering if this might be a good thing to do in code. Above my pay grade.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
29 Sep 24 * Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]72186282@ud0s4.net
29 Sep 24 +* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]70The Natural Philosopher
29 Sep 24 i+* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]68Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Sep 24 ii+* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]6Lars Poulsen
29 Sep 24 iii+- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Lars Poulsen
30 Sep 24 iii`* Re: Procedural, Functional, String [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Sep 24 iii `* Re: Procedural, Functional, String [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]3Lars Poulsen
30 Sep 24 iii  +- Re: Procedural, Functional, String [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Peter Dean
30 Sep 24 iii  `- Re: Procedural, Functional, String [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Dennis Boone
29 Sep 24 ii+* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]30rbowman
30 Sep 24 iii`* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]29Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Sep 24 iii `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]28Pancho
30 Sep 24 iii  `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]27Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Oct 24 iii   +- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Oct 24 iii   `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]25Pancho
1 Oct 24 iii    +* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]20The Natural Philosopher
1 Oct 24 iii    i+* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Oct 24 iii    ii+* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]3rbowman
3 Oct 24 iii    iii`* C operator precedence rules2Stefan Ram
3 Oct 24 iii    iii `- Re: C operator precedence rules1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 iii    ii`* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]4Peter Flass
4 Oct 24 iii    ii `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]3Bob Eager
4 Oct 24 iii    ii  `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]2The Natural Philosopher
4 Oct 24 iii    ii   `- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Oct 24 iii    i+- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Oct 24 iii    i+* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]6Peter Flass
2 Oct 24 iii    ii+- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1The Natural Philosopher
2 Oct 24 iii    ii`* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]4The Natural Philosopher
2 Oct 24 iii    ii `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]3Rich Alderson
3 Oct 24 iii    ii  +- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1The Natural Philosopher
3 Oct 24 iii    ii  `- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Stefan Ram
2 Oct 24 iii    i+* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]3The Natural Philosopher
3 Oct 24 iii    ii`* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]2Peter Flass
3 Oct 24 iii    ii `- Re: Recursion [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Oct 24 iii    i`- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Pancho
1 Oct 24 iii    `* Re: Multiple Inheritance [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Oct 24 iii     `* Re: Multiple Inheritance [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]3Pancho
3 Oct 24 iii      `* Re: Multiple Inheritance [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Oct 24 iii       `- Re: Multiple Inheritance [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1rbowman
30 Sep 24 ii`* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]31John Ames
30 Sep 24 ii +* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]27Stefan Ram
30 Sep 24 ii i`* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]26John Ames
30 Sep 24 ii i +* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]22Stefan Ram
1 Oct 24 ii i i+* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]20John Ames
1 Oct 24 ii i ii+* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]3Stefan Ram
1 Oct 24 ii i iii+- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1John Ames
3 Oct 24 ii i iii`- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Waldek Hebisch
1 Oct 24 ii i ii`* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]16The Natural Philosopher
1 Oct 24 ii i ii +* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]2John Ames
1 Oct 24 ii i ii i`- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1The Natural Philosopher
1 Oct 24 ii i ii `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]13Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Oct 24 ii i ii  `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]12John Ames
1 Oct 24 ii i ii   `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]11Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Oct 24 ii i ii    `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]10John Ames
2 Oct 24 ii i ii     `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]9Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Oct 24 ii i ii      `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]8186282@ud0s4.net
23 Oct 24 ii i ii       `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]7John Ames
23 Oct 24 ii i ii        `* Re: The Joy Of Object-Orientation6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Oct 24 ii i ii         +- Re: The Joy Of Object-Orientation1John Ames
24 Oct 24 ii i ii         `* Re: The Joy Of Object-Orientation4186282@ud0s4.net
24 Oct 24 ii i ii          `* Re: The Joy Of Object-Orientation3186282@ud0s4.net
24 Oct 24 ii i ii           `* Re: The Joy Of Object-Orientation2The Natural Philosopher
25 Oct 24 ii i ii            `- Re: The Joy Of Object-Orientation1186282@ud0s4.net
1 Oct 24 ii i i`- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Mike Spencer
30 Sep 24 ii i `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Sep 24 ii i  `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]2John Ames
1 Oct 24 ii i   `- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Oct 24 ii `* Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]3rbowman
1 Oct 24 ii  +- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Oct 24 ii  `- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1John Ames
30 Sep 24 i`- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1Pancho
30 Sep 24 `- Re: TeX and Pascal [was Re: The joy of FORTRAN]1moi

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal