Liste des Groupes | Revenir à col misc |
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 23:48:43 -0400, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:I used to ask potential clients 'what can you absolutely not do without? Let's get that down first, and see how much it is going to cost, and then we can discuss the nice-to-haves in order of desirability and cost, and if possible, leave the option to add in more when your budget can take it'.
Clients want "something" - but they're often not sure what that willI've reviewed RFPs where the requirement if Section II Paragraph 14c is
look and feel like. They will ALWAYS have complaints, ALWAYS want
more and more 'features', some of which will be incompatible with
each other, added and may run off to somebody else expecting magic.
contradicted by Section VII Paragraph 37a. Particularly when dealing with
government agencies you realize the whole mess is a cut'n'paste of prior
RFPs that was never read in its entirety. (aside: I shudder to think about
those 1000 page laws the idiots pass)
To be honest there often is a lot of wishful thinking in the response.Its at that point in the sales process that you need an experienced coder in with the salesman.
"Well, we sorta, kinda can do that..."
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.