Sujet : Re: GNOME/Freedesktop/redhat incompetent or malicious influence
De : nntp (at) *nospam* fulltermprivacy.com (Phillip Frabott)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 12. Oct 2024, 17:43:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vee8uq$7vmp$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 10/11/2024 04:53, D wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2024, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> wrote:
Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote:
In comp.os.linux.misc Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:
But RedHat, and its lackey Poettering,
>
You should note that the lackey Poettering is now employed by his
original handler when he was employed by RedHat: Microsoft.
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lennart_Poettering
>
Lennart Poettering (born 15 October 1980) is a German software
engineer working for Microsoft ...
>
Microsoft is putting an awful lot of money into Linux. I consider that
a good thing.
>
I would prefer a free OS funded by lots of organisations putting a
little money in, rather than relying on a few companies that invest
a lot and whose individual opinions therefore matter. But beggers
can't be choosers (although I can still choose old versions of
Linux, like I'm using now, for some things).
>
Microsoft funding something they don't own, usually boils down to:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extinguish .
I bothers me how many Linux users want these large corps money in the game. It's dangerous in my opinion because these companies don't have their users best interests at heart at all. And for Microsoft it's all EEE anyways so Microsoft's Money in Linux is very bad news. (yes, pun intended for those who got it).
-- Phillip Frabott----------- Adam: Is a void really a void if it returns?- Jack: No, it's just nullspace at that point.----------