Re: Named pipes vs. Unix sockets

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col misc 
Sujet : Re: Named pipes vs. Unix sockets
De : nntp (at) *nospam* fulltermprivacy.com (Phillip Frabott)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.misc
Date : 22. Nov 2024, 23:06:06
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vhqv8f$1br87$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 11/22/2024 15:52, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 10:00:31 -0500, Phillip Frabott wrote:
 
At the moment we have to do 4.6GB per 0.5sec to keep up, and
7GB per 0.5sec to stay ahead. We've done everything we can to squeeze
out as much performance from pipes as we could but there just isn't much
we can do anymore.
 Sounds like a job for a shared memory section.
That only works if the entire dataset originates on, and results within, the same system. Unfortunately this is not the case so it wouldn't be possible. This is an intermediate system between the intake and final processing systems which are further down the line.
Unless you can recommend a way to do shared memory across different machines without extra hardware. Currently we ingest data from a (external) /dev (unbuffered data stream) into a process on the machine that buffers the data (currently though an unnamed pipe, which as I said before is in the process of being replaced with UNIX socket) then that data pipes to another process (again, being replaced with UNIX socket soon) which converts the data stream from the buffer to block data and then categorizes those blocks based on data types and depending on those data types sends it to one of 4 /dev devices that leave the machine. The bottleneck is not between the first and second process (buffer process and stream to block data processor) it's between the intake /dev to the intermediate and the intermediate to the 4 outbound /devs. These /dev are not networks so there is no TCP data. They are hard lined between the /dev machine and the intermediate computer and the intermediate computer to the 4 other /dev machines. So how would I share memory between /dev machines from the 80s-90s and the intermediate computer without using any network or TCP/UDP capabilities?
(If it was not apparent. these are manufacturing machines.)
--
Phillip Frabott
----------
- Adam: Is a void really a void if it returns?
- Jack: No, it's just nullspace at that point.
----------

Date Sujet#  Auteur
18 Nov 24 * Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?76186282@ud0s4.net
18 Nov 24 +* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?3D
20 Nov 24 i`* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?2186282@ud0s4.net
20 Nov 24 i `- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1D
18 Nov 24 +- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Pancho
18 Nov 24 +- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Richard Kettlewell
18 Nov 24 +* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?48Rich
18 Nov 24 i`* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?47Phillip Frabott
20 Nov 24 i `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?46Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Nov 24 i  `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?45Phillip Frabott
21 Nov 24 i   `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?44Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Nov 24 i    `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?43Phillip Frabott
21 Nov 24 i     +* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?20Richard Kettlewell
22 Nov 24 i     i`* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?19Phillip Frabott
22 Nov 24 i     i +* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?17Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Nov 24 i     i i`* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?16vallor
22 Nov 24 i     i i +* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?10Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Nov 24 i     i i i`* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?9vallor
22 Nov 24 i     i i i `* Named pipes vs. Unix sockets (was: Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?)8vallor
22 Nov 24 i     i i i  `* Re: Named pipes vs. Unix sockets7vallor
22 Nov 24 i     i i i   +- Re: Named pipes vs. Unix sockets1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Nov 24 i     i i i   `* Re: Named pipes vs. Unix sockets5Phillip Frabott
22 Nov 24 i     i i i    +* Re: Named pipes vs. Unix sockets3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Nov 24 i     i i i    i`* Re: Named pipes vs. Unix sockets2Phillip Frabott
23 Nov 24 i     i i i    i `- Re: Named pipes vs. Unix sockets1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Dec 24 i     i i i    `- Re: Named pipes vs. Unix sockets1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Nov 24 i     i i `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?5Rich
23 Nov 24 i     i i  +* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?3vallor
23 Nov 24 i     i i  i+- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Rich
23 Nov 24 i     i i  i`- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Nov 24 i     i i  `- Pipes v. FIFOs (was: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?)1Geoff Clare
22 Nov 24 i     i `- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Richard Kettlewell
21 Nov 24 i     `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?22Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Nov 24 i      `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?21186282@ud0s4.net
22 Nov 24 i       `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?20Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Nov 24 i        `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?19186282@ud0s4.net
23 Nov 24 i         `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?18Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Nov 24 i          `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?17186282@ud0s4.net
23 Nov 24 i           +* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Nov 24 i           i`* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?5Carlos E.R.
23 Nov 24 i           i +* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?2Fritz Wuehler
24 Nov 24 i           i i`- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Carlos E.R.
24 Nov 24 i           i `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Nov 24 i           i  `- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Carlos E.R.
23 Nov 24 i           `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?10The Natural Philosopher
23 Nov 24 i            `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?9Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Nov 24 i             `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?8186282@ud0s4.net
24 Nov 24 i              +- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Nov 24 i              `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?6Rich
24 Nov 24 i               `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?5Lew Pitcher
24 Nov 24 i                +- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Rich
24 Nov 24 i                `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?3Richard Kettlewell
24 Nov 24 i                 +- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Carlos E.R.
24 Nov 24 i                 `- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Rich
20 Nov 24 `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?22Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Dec 24  `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?21186282@ud0s4.net
3 Dec 24   +* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Dec 24   i`* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?2186282@ud0s4.net
4 Dec 24   i `- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Dec 24   `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?17Pancho
14 Dec 24    `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?16root
14 Dec 24     `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?15The Natural Philosopher
17 Dec14:34      `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?14Geoff Clare
18 Dec02:23       `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?13Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Dec05:25        `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?12186282@ud0s4.net
18 Dec06:01         `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?11Rich
18 Dec06:12          +* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?5Robert Riches
18 Dec15:03          i`* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?4Rich
19 Dec05:27          i `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?3Robert Riches
19 Dec15:07          i  `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?2Rich
19 Dec16:02          i   `- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1D
18 Dec09:27          `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?5Richard Kettlewell
18 Dec15:02           `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?4Rich
18 Dec17:11            `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?3John Ames
18 Dec17:51             +- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Rich
18 Dec19:32             `- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Richard Kettlewell

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal