Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col misc 
Sujet : Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?
De : lew.pitcher (at) *nospam* digitalfreehold.ca (Lew Pitcher)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.misc
Date : 24. Nov 2024, 16:48:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vhvht1$28nn4$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Pan/0.139 (Sexual Chocolate; GIT bf56508 git://git.gnome.org/pan2)
On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 14:25:10 +0000, Rich wrote:

186282@ud0s4.net <186283@ud0s4.net> wrote:
On 11/23/24 4:25 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
That’s irrelevant.  Pipes originated on the earliest Unix machine,
which was a PDP-11 with only a 64kiB address space.  They work great
for pumping around gigabytes of data, but you don’t need
gigabyte-sized memory buffers to do that.
 
  It all has to be SOMEWHERE ... if not in RAM then
  on a mass storage device.
 
Nope, at least not with pipes.

Hold on a sec.... pipes are /buffered/ in RAM, so there's at least
a small bit of ram set aside for each open pipe. On Linux, pipe(7)
says "In Linux versions before 2.6.11, the capacity of a pipe was
      the same as the system page size (e.g., 4096 bytes on i386).
      Since  Linux  2.6.11, the pipe capacity is 65536 bytes. Since
      Linux 2.6.35, the default pipe capacity is 65536 bytes, but
      the capacity can be queried and set  using the  fcntl(2)
      F_GETPIPE_SZ  and F_SETPIPE_SZ operations.  See fcntl(2) for
      more information."
and that "capacity" referred to consists of a kernel-managed RAM buffer.

[snip]



--
Lew Pitcher
"In Skills We Trust"

Date Sujet#  Auteur
18 Nov 24 * Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?80186282@ud0s4.net
18 Nov 24 +* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?3D
20 Nov 24 i`* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?2186282@ud0s4.net
20 Nov 24 i `- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1D
18 Nov 24 +- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Pancho
18 Nov 24 +- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Richard Kettlewell
18 Nov 24 +* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?52Rich
18 Nov 24 i`* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?51Phillip Frabott
20 Nov 24 i `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?50Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Nov 24 i  `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?49Phillip Frabott
21 Nov 24 i   `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?48Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Nov 24 i    `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?47Phillip Frabott
21 Nov 24 i     +* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?20Richard Kettlewell
22 Nov 24 i     i`* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?19Phillip Frabott
22 Nov 24 i     i +* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?17Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Nov 24 i     i i`* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?16vallor
22 Nov 24 i     i i +* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?10Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Nov 24 i     i i i`* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?9vallor
22 Nov 24 i     i i i `* Named pipes vs. Unix sockets (was: Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?)8vallor
22 Nov 24 i     i i i  `* Re: Named pipes vs. Unix sockets7vallor
22 Nov 24 i     i i i   +- Re: Named pipes vs. Unix sockets1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Nov 24 i     i i i   `* Re: Named pipes vs. Unix sockets5Phillip Frabott
22 Nov 24 i     i i i    +* Re: Named pipes vs. Unix sockets3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Nov 24 i     i i i    i`* Re: Named pipes vs. Unix sockets2Phillip Frabott
23 Nov 24 i     i i i    i `- Re: Named pipes vs. Unix sockets1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Dec 24 i     i i i    `- Re: Named pipes vs. Unix sockets1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Nov 24 i     i i `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?5Rich
23 Nov 24 i     i i  +* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?3vallor
23 Nov 24 i     i i  i+- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Rich
23 Nov 24 i     i i  i`- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Nov 24 i     i i  `- Pipes v. FIFOs (was: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?)1Geoff Clare
22 Nov 24 i     i `- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Richard Kettlewell
21 Nov 24 i     `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?26Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Nov 24 i      `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?25186282@ud0s4.net
22 Nov 24 i       `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?24Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Nov 24 i        `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?23186282@ud0s4.net
23 Nov 24 i         `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?22Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Nov 24 i          `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?21186282@ud0s4.net
23 Nov 24 i           +* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Nov 24 i           i`* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?5Carlos E.R.
23 Nov 24 i           i +* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?2Fritz Wuehler
24 Nov 24 i           i i`- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Carlos E.R.
23 Nov 24 i           i `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Nov 24 i           i  `- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Carlos E.R.
23 Nov 24 i           `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?14The Natural Philosopher
23 Nov 24 i            `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?13Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Nov 24 i             `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?12186282@ud0s4.net
24 Nov 24 i              +- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Nov 24 i              `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?10Rich
24 Nov 24 i               `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?9Lew Pitcher
24 Nov 24 i                +- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Rich
24 Nov 24 i                `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?7Richard Kettlewell
24 Nov 24 i                 +- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Carlos E.R.
24 Nov 24 i                 +- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Rich
25 Dec 24 i                 `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?4186282@ud0s4.net
27 Dec 24 i                  +- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Richard Kettlewell
28 Dec 24 i                  +- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Jan 25 i                  `- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Jerry Peters
20 Nov 24 `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?22Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Dec 24  `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?21186282@ud0s4.net
3 Dec 24   +* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Dec 24   i`* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?2186282@ud0s4.net
4 Dec 24   i `- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Dec 24   `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?17Pancho
14 Dec 24    `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?16root
14 Dec 24     `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?15The Natural Philosopher
17 Dec 24      `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?14Geoff Clare
18 Dec 24       `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?13Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Dec 24        `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?12186282@ud0s4.net
18 Dec 24         `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?11Rich
18 Dec 24          +* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?5Robert Riches
18 Dec 24          i`* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?4Rich
19 Dec 24          i `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?3Robert Riches
19 Dec 24          i  `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?2Rich
19 Dec 24          i   `- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1D
18 Dec 24          `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?5Richard Kettlewell
18 Dec 24           `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?4Rich
18 Dec 24            `* Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?3John Ames
18 Dec 24             +- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Rich
18 Dec 24             `- Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?1Richard Kettlewell

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal