Sujet : Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?
De : rich (at) *nospam* example.invalid (Rich)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 11. Dec 2024, 21:54:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vjcu5t$1n2m9$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : tin/2.6.1-20211226 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.139 (x86_64))
rbowman <
bowman@montana.com> wrote:
On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 00:07:04 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
However to get good efficiency you couldn't burn the hydrogen - huge
FUEL CELLS would be required.
Even then, considerable loss.
It has infrastructure problems but Toyota's fuel cell vehicle is feasible.
Excluding catastrophic tank failure I don't think hydrogen would be more
of a problem than propane.
Typical propane tank pressure: 100-200psi [1]
Typical hydrogen tank pressure (for cars): 350 - 700bar which is 5,000
- 10,000 psi [2]
A 5k to 10k psi tank rupture will impart much more kinetic energy into
the shrapnel thrown off than a 100-200 psi tank rupture will impart.
And that ignores the impact of the pressure wave created by the
decompression of the stored gas itself.
[1]
https://www.ferrellgas.com/tank-talk/blog-articles/how-much-pressure-is-in-a-propane-tank/[2]
https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/physical-hydrogen-storage