Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1

On 12/30/24 5:18 PM, chrisv wrote:

lying asshole -hh wrote:
 

(garbage snipped)

 Gosh, not one quote of advocate "haters" being "loudly critical" of
Photoshop. 

Liar.  That's why you snipped your own quoted words.

Only quotes of advocates making reasonable points about> value, ...

Spin attempt detected.  Unfortunately, the only way that this point actually becomes "reasonable" is by finally admitting that many/most Linux fanboys are chronic consummate cheapskates.

and one example of an advocate (sdb) who arbitrarity assigned a
one cent cost to GIMP.  Why does -highhorse think that his snittish
attack is valid because of one brain-fart?  Why does -highhorse feel
the need to lie about me "trying to forget" that brain-fart, which I
called-out at the time?  You don't see trolls calling each other out,
when they say something stupid. 

To which chrisv now tries to spin a tale of "one brain-fart" to explain his prior statement ... but that dodge attempt was anticipated:  its why there were two chrisv quotes provided, not just one.

Why doesn't -highhorse quote me saying that Photoshop is a powerful
tool for professionals and serious amateurs? 

Why doesn't chrisv actually substantiate that he made that claim?
Go post the Google Groups URL link to validate your claim or crawl away.

What an asshole.
 Meanwhile, I have quotes that directly show -highhorse *lying* to
attack, like his snittish assertion that any advocate would "globally
reject" Photoshop "for all possible consumers".

Oh, there's no doubt that that's what you *believe* was being said, but you believing stuff doesn't mean that it actually was what was actually being said.  Another such example was in how you protested so strongly against Barry Schwartz's "Paradox of Choice" research:  he's got a PhD and a TED talk, but we're supposed to believe that _you_ know better!
Translation: chrisv Pwned.  Again.
And going out the year with another bushel of butthurt.
-hh