Sujet : Re: The joy of FORTRAN
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.miscDate : 27. Feb 2025, 22:43:56
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vpqmas$39d65$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
User-Agent : Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 12:00:23 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
What mattered in COBOL applications was no bugs. None. Not one.
*Cough* Y2K *Cough*
The process of analysing a business and creating business oriented
applications that were 100% reliable lead to system analysts working out
how to do it and passing the specification down to programmers and
testing every single module.
You *do* realize that the “waterfall” method (what you described above)
was only put up as a strawman in a 1970s research paper to advocate for
more versatile software development techniques? Nobody in the real world
worked that way -- not successfully. Because it was a recipe for producing
software that was out of date by the time it shipped.
This is big corporation stuff .
You really think big corporations like, say, Google or Facebook, work that
way?
IIRC Microfocus COBOL still makes a profit.
Microfocus makes a profit, yes. But not from its COBOL compiler.